3D Scanning for Fabrication in Smithfield NSW – Improving Industrial Fit-Up
Hamilton By Design shares expert insights into mechanical engineering, 3D laser scanning, SolidWorks modelling, and industrial plant design. Focused on mining, manufacturing, and infrastructure projects, this blog explores scan-to-CAD workflows, fabrication-ready detailing, and engineering-led solutions that reduce risk, improve accuracy, and deliver real-world outcomes for clients, engineers, and fabricators across Australia.
The terms terrestrial scanner and LiDAR scanner are often used interchangeably — but they don’t mean the same thing.
Understanding the difference is important, particularly when scan data is used for engineering design, fabrication, or as-built documentation.
In this post, we explain the difference in plain language and outline when each scanning approach is fit-for-purpose.
LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) is the technology used to measure distance.
It works by:
Emitting laser pulses
Measuring how long the laser takes to return
Converting those measurements into a 3D point cloud
LiDAR is used across construction, mining, engineering, and infrastructure projects because it can capture complex geometry quickly and accurately.
A terrestrial scanner describes how a LiDAR scanner is deployed.
Terrestrial scanning means the scanner is:
Ground-based
Typically tripod-mounted
Capturing data from fixed, controlled positions
Most modern terrestrial scanners use LiDAR technology, but the term terrestrial refers to the deployment method, not the measurement system.
Put simply:
LiDAR is the technology.
Terrestrial is the platform.
Most terrestrial scanners are LiDAR scanners — but not all LiDAR scanners are terrestrial.
Other common LiDAR platforms include:
Mobile or SLAM scanners
Vehicle-mounted scanners
Drone or aerial LiDAR
Each has strengths and limitations depending on how the data will be used.
Problems often arise when:
A LiDAR scan is assumed to be engineering-grade
Mobile or SLAM scans are used for fabrication or fit-up
Accuracy and limitations aren’t aligned with the intended outcome
This doesn’t mean one method is wrong — it means scanner choice should match project risk, accuracy requirements, and deliverables.
A simple guide:
Fabrication or replacement parts → Terrestrial LiDAR
Shutdown-critical fit-up → Terrestrial LiDAR
Structural verification → Terrestrial LiDAR
Rapid site context or layout → Mobile / SLAM LiDAR
Large areas or access constraints → Drone LiDAR
There is no single “best” scanner — only the most suitable scanner for the outcome you need.
When scan data feeds into engineering design or documentation, higher-control scanning methods are typically required to support defensible outcomes and meet engineering expectations.
That doesn’t remove choice — it simply ensures the assumptions and limitations are clear from the start.
We’ve published a full breakdown on our website explaining:
Terrestrial vs mobile vs drone LiDAR
Accuracy, control, and risk differences
How scanning choices affect engineering outcomes
Read the full article here:
https://www.hamiltonbydesign.com.au/difference-between-terrestrial-and-lidar-scanner/
If you’re unsure which scanning approach suits your project, we’re always happy to discuss the options.
Hamilton By Design is an Australian mechanical engineering consultancy providing engineering-led 3D scanning, reverse engineering, and as-built documentation for industrial, construction, and manufacturing projects.
#Engineering #3DScanning #LiDAR